Our Methodology

Evidence-Based Privacy Evaluation

Transparency is the foundation of trust. Explore our rigorous evaluation framework that transforms complex privacy concepts into clear, actionable scores you can rely on.

Our Core Principles

Every evaluation follows these foundational principles to ensure consistency, transparency, and actionable insights.

Evidence-Based

Every score is backed by documented testing, policy analysis, and real-world usage patterns.

Consistent Standards

All products in a category are evaluated using identical criteria for fair comparison.

User-Centric

We prioritize factors that impact real people, not just technical specifications.

Continuously Updated

Regular re-evaluations ensure scores reflect current privacy practices and threats.

Scoring Framework

Our comprehensive evaluation system breaks down privacy into measurable categories, each weighted by its impact on your data security.

Total weight must equal 100%. Each category is independently scored 0-100, then weighted to produce final score.

Understanding Risk Levels

We translate complex scores into clear risk categories, helping you make informed decisions at a glance.

Minimal Risk

Score: 80-100

Excellent privacy practices with strong user protections and minimal data exposure.

Examples:

End-to-end encrypted messaging

Privacy-first search engines

Open-source password managers

Low Risk

Score: 60-79

Good privacy practices with some data collection for functionality. Generally trustworthy.

Examples:

Privacy-focused email services

Reputable VPN providers

Secure cloud storage

Moderate Risk

Score: 40-59

Average privacy practices with notable data collection. Requires careful settings management.

Examples:

Mainstream social platforms

Popular productivity apps

Standard email providers

High Risk

Score: 0-39

Significant privacy concerns with extensive data collection and limited user control.

Examples:

Ad-supported free services

Data broker platforms

Invasive tracking apps

Our Evaluation Process

Every product undergoes a rigorous multi-stage evaluation combining automated analysis with expert human review.

1

Policy Analysis

Comprehensive review of privacy policies, terms of service, and public disclosures.

2-3 days
2

Technical Testing

Network traffic analysis, permission audits, and security vulnerability assessment.

3-5 days
3

Real-World Usage

Extended testing period to evaluate actual data collection and user experience.

7-14 days
4

Expert Review

Privacy engineers and consumer advocates evaluate findings against scoring criteria.

2-3 days
5

Score Publication

Final scores published with detailed breakdowns and actionable recommendations.

1-2 days

Methodology Updates & Transparency

We continuously refine our evaluation criteria based on emerging privacy threats and user feedback. Every change is documented and timestamped.

Current Methodology Version

v3.2.0
Last Updated: January 5, 2026
v3.2.0MINOR
January 5, 2026
  • Enhanced AI training data usage evaluation criteria
  • Added biometric data collection assessment factors
  • Updated third-party SDK tracking methodology
  • Improved mobile app permission analysis framework
v3.1.0MINOR
November 12, 2025
  • Introduced browser fingerprinting detection methods
  • Expanded data retention policy evaluation
  • Added cross-device tracking assessment
  • Updated encryption standard requirements
v3.0.0MAJOR
August 20, 2025
  • Complete scoring framework overhaul with weighted categories
  • New risk level classification system
  • Enhanced transparency and accountability criteria
  • Standardized evaluation process across all product categories

How We Compare

Our methodology stands apart from traditional privacy reviews through rigorous testing and transparent scoring.

Evaluation AspectData Champion®Other Reviews
Testing Duration
14-30 days of real-world usage
Quick overview or single-day testing
Technical Analysis
Network traffic monitoring, permission audits, code review
Policy reading only
Scoring Transparency
Detailed breakdown with weighted categories
Single overall rating without explanation
Update Frequency
Quarterly re-evaluations for all products
One-time review, rarely updated
Independence
No affiliate links, transparent funding
Affiliate-driven recommendations
User Perspective
Real-world usage scenarios and practical guidance
Technical specifications focus

Ready to Make Informed Privacy Decisions?

Explore our product evaluations and discover privacy-respecting alternatives that don't compromise on functionality.